·
Problem statement for the assignment
- Ideally my product will give people an accessible and comfortable work station. It will give them the peace of mind to have this work station readily available at their need without taking up a significant amount of space in their baggage. For the average person their laptop is essentially their life on one device. Important documents are stored on here, emails, memos, pictures, and research. As many would love to just forget about work, many cannot just do that. They need their laptop to work
while away. People travel either for business or vacation every day and most people indefinitely bring their laptop with them.
My method for this product
is to produce it out of light weight material that is easy to
clean, safe for the environment, and low cost. My ideas for this
product will include several features such as rubber grips on
the surface, Velcro straps, side bins, wrist rests and a soft
bottom layer for comfort. Traveling shouldn’t restrict anyone’s
ability to work, instead it should provide free time they can
use to be productive. The decision matrix helped me choose
design #2 from assignment 3 to be the best choice to achieve
what I want from this product. I want to use this design to
hopefully give my customers the best possible product I can
provide. I plan for this product to have multiple purposes and
act as an important essential to travelers.
·
- Assumptions
about the problem
·
People lose essential supplies when working on the computer.
·
Laptops and tablets do not
sit comfortably on your lap.
·
When traveling the user may
not have enough room to comfortably set out their laptop in
front of them
·
-Pugh/Decision Matrix
Rank |
Percentage |
Criteria |
Design 1 Grade |
Design 1 Value |
Design 2 Grade |
Design 2 Value |
Design 3 Grade |
Design 3 Value |
6 |
.10 |
Purpose |
4 |
.4 |
3 |
.3 |
3 |
.3 |
4 |
.15 |
Storage |
3 |
.45 |
1 |
.15 |
5 |
.75 |
5 |
.25 |
Size |
4 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
.15 |
Design |
2 |
.3 |
3 |
.45 |
3 |
.45 |
3 |
.15 |
Appearance |
3 |
.45 |
5 |
.75 |
2 |
.3 |
1 |
.20 |
Ease |
5 |
1 |
4 |
.8 |
3 |
.6 |
Total: |
1.0 |
Total: |
|
3.60 |
|
3.45 |
|
3.40 |
·
-Multiple solutions
These
Multiple
solutions will be focusing on the sub-assembly of the face of
the product. That includes the features that will be designed
and implemented into the top of the product. The first concept
designs are shown to give you a better understanding of overall
effects of the sub-assemblies.
FR |
Dp |
A |
R |
R |
C |
Practicle |
Able to useful and needed |
Focus on needs of customers |
Pointless, No need for |
https://www.nap.edu/read/14137/chapter/6 |
Pinpoint the needs |
Size |
Measure
Precise |
Plan out
Design |
Not
enough Space |
https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2018/01/comprehensive-guide-product-design/ |
Increase
length of Product |
Design |
Features placed well |
Use several concepts for best flow |
Block or over lapped features |
https://www.smashingmagazine.com/2018/01/comprehensive-guide-product-design/ |
Measure size and Plan for results |
FR |
Dp |
A |
R |
R |
C |
Cover-Up |
Use lids to cover holes |
Create tops for storage |
Lids are lost |
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lid |
Added extra covers |
Attachable |
The
ability to add needed space or features |
Add
attachable modules |
They
break off |
https://www.phonescoop.com/articles/article.php?a=20758 |
Secure
attachments by Velcro |
Style |
Features blend in with product |
Appealing to eye |
Features stand out, Ugly |
https://faculty.insead.edu/manuel-sosa/documents/chan_mihm_sosa_2016-40.pdf |
Offer different styles |
FR |
Dp |
A |
R |
R |
C |
Essential |
Only what is needed no extra |
Keep to bare minimum |
Extra features that are wanted not needed |
https://www.designbetter.co/principles-of-product-design |
Simple is better |
Purpose |
Feature
functions as designed |
Test
features |
They
break or don’t work as anticipated |
https://hbswk.hbs.edu/Pages/browse.aspx?HBSTopic=Product%20Design |
Offer
Replacements |
Ease |
Difficulty of features |
Who can use it and how easy? |
Confusing method of use |
https://www.interaction-design.org/literature/article/how-to-design-for-ease-of-use |
Add Instructions |
·
Parametric Modeling
Technique is a good concept for Modeling when having to change
while in mid design. This technique helps ensure that
requirements and guidelines are met. This method of modeling can
be beneficial in feedback as well. This technique is also best
when subjecting uncertain situations. This method relies on
mathematical equations which reduce the chance for human bias.
https://galorath.com/company/books/what-is-parametric-modeling/
Trade offs between the
different modules are the features, the design, and the layout
of the face of the product. Although this may not be a big deal
with a product like this everything must be designed for a
purpose and utilize the space for usefulness. In module one we
used the design from Assignment #3 that was chosen by the
decision matrix. This design was simple but had what the product
was intended to do. The large storage gives the user a lot of
space for supplies and need tools. While having a wrist rest and
pencil holder. The Second Module has a pencil holder, but with a
deeper circular storage spot. This can be used for drinks or
just whatever the user needs it for. The wrist rest on module
two is at an arch. I designed it this way so it would have
better support on your wrists and have “style”. Module three
uses more of the space given for storage. This design has a
storage compartment underneath the designated place for the
user’s laptop. Although this is useless when the lap is covering
it, it gives the user more available room to place supplies.
Each Design of features has its pros and cons which is why it is
important to create a decision matrix.
This Product has Zero
degrees of Motion. There are no joints or links for us to
analyze and no parts in motion. We can look at the force applied
to the face of the product from different angles, but there will
only be a force down and a normal force facing the opposite way.
·
Gantt Chart
·
Updated Problem Statement 2018/10/12 from 4:15PM-4:30PM
·
Created FRDPARRC for
Modules 2018/10/15 from 10:20AM-11AM
·
Updated Gant chart for
assignments 2018/10/15 from 3:00 PM to 3:30PM
·
Created New Decision
Matrix, 2018/10/16 from 2:45 PM to 4:00 PM
·
Filled out decision matrix,
2018/10/16 from 4:30PM to 5:00PM
·
Commented on Advisees,
2018/10/19 from 5:00PM to 5:15PM
·
Filled out assignment
template 2018/10/27 from 4:00PM to 7:00PM
·
Lessons
Learned
· What the Parametric Modeling Technique
·
What Module in a Concept Design is
·
How to work AutoCAD again
·
Comments
to each advisee
·
Website looking organized and clean
·
Nice detailed Concepts
·
Good Problem Statement
·
Ryan Harbert
·
Flow of website is good
·
Gantt Chart and drawings are neat and
well placed