Job Outlook for Technical Writers


Below are snippets of information about the job outlook for technical writers. This information comes directly from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Outlook Handbook (online). The links for the blocks of text or tables are included above each selection:

http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos089.htm#outlook (emphasis mine)

Job prospects. Job prospects, especially for applicants with solid communication and technical skills, are expected to be good. The growing reliance on technologically sophisticated products in the home and the workplace and the increasing complexity of medical or scientific information needed for daily living will create many new job opportunities for technical writers. However, competition will exist for technical writing positions with more desirable companies and for workers who are new to the occupation. In addition to job openings created by employment growth, some openings will arise as experienced workers retire, transfer to other occupations, or leave the labor force. Also, many freelancers may not earn enough money by freelancing to remain in the occupation, thus generating additional job openings.

Projections data from the National Employment Matrix

Occupational title SOC Code Employment, 2008 Projected
employment,
2018
Change, 2008-2018
Number Percent
Technical writers 27-3042 48,900 57,800 8,900 18

NOTE: Data in this table are rounded. See the discussion of the employment projections table in the Handbook introductory chapter on Occupational Information Included in the Handbook.

Projections data from the National Employment Matrix

Occupational title SOC Code Employment, 2008 Projected
employment,
2018
Change, 2008-2018
Number Percent

Authors, Writers, and editors

---

281,300

303,300

22,100

8

Editors

27-3041

129,600

129,200

-400

0

Writers and authors

27-3043

151,700

174,100

22,500

15

NOTE: Data in this table are rounded. See the discussion of the employment projections table in the Handbook introductory chapter on Occupational Information Included in the Handbook.

Occupational Employment and Wages for Technical Writers(Updated with May 2008 data)

National estimates for this occupation:

Employment estimate and mean wage estimates for this occupation:

Employment Employment
RSE
Mean hourly
wage
Mean annual
wage
Wage RSE
47,460 1.9 % $30.87 $64,210 0.7 %

Percentile wage estimates for this occupation:

Percentile 10% 25% 50%
(Median)
75% 90%
Hourly Wage $17.55 $22.64 $29.62 $37.94 $46.86
Annual Wage  $36,500 $47,100 $61,620 $78,910 $97,460

Occupational Employment Statistics

The chart below, which shows technical writers by state, was derived from the Create Customized Tables on the BLS's State profile for this occupation section of the Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2006 page for Technical Writers. You can use the Create Customized Tables feature to see data for all jobs.

Occupation: Technical Writers (SOC code 273042)
Period: May 2006

Area name Employment(1) Employment percent relative standard error(3) Hourly mean wage Annual mean wage(2) Wage percent relative standard error(3) Annual median wage(2)

Alabama

540 8.0 24.95 51900 1.9 50870

Alaska

130 20.5 27.57 57340 3.7 55610

Arizona

820 15.8 30.29 63010 3.3 61600

Arkansas

170 13.6 21.69 45120 3.9 45760

California

6760 3.7 36.96 76880 1.9 75680

Colorado

1210 10.7 31.78 66100 1.1 65590

Connecticut

(8)- (8)- 28.13 58510 2.9 56430

Delaware

120 21.7 26.31 54720 2.3 53920

District of Columbia

570 18.6 33.76 70220 1.8 68530

Florida

1640 8.8 27.04 56240 2.5 55640

Georgia

1530 10.0 31.37 65240 5.4 65680

Idaho

280 30.3 27.75 57710 4.7 53730

Illinois

1540 11.5 30.21 62840 3.2 60750

Indiana

730 20.3 29.35 61050 9.8 52770

Iowa

460 7.2 29.08 60480 11.5 49410

Kansas

720 5.3 24.99 51980 1.8 50850

Kentucky

430 43.6 24.29 50520 3.1 52800

Louisiana

190 15.9 23.68 49250 3.0 48380

Maine

60 17.3 22.53 46860 3.5 44900

Maryland

2010 6.0 31.98 66510 1.5 65250

Massachusetts

2480 6.6 37.68 78380 2.1 78800

Michigan

2030 10.6 29.75 61890 2.1 58850

Minnesota

1170 7.4 30.17 62750 1.3 62810

Mississippi

280 35.0 22.90 47630 5.5 49870

Missouri

670 5.7 26.44 55000 3.8 53730

Montana

90 20.3 22.03 45830 3.2 45750

Nebraska

240 11.3 22.51 46810 2.6 45500

Nevada

260 18.5 25.58 53200 5.6 52400

New Hampshire

220 10.5 34.96 72720 2.5 72290

New Jersey

1750 8.1 31.61 65760 2.2 62150

New Mexico

390 10.3 33.92 70550 8.6 64690

New York

1890 7.6 30.81 64070 2.1 61660

North Carolina

950 8.3 30.31 63040 1.5 60890

North Dakota

50 8.2 21.94 45640 4.2 45270

Ohio

1400 7.4 26.88 55910 2.8 55170

Oklahoma

320 14.8 21.99 45750 4.6 43390

Oregon

720 10.9 30.98 64450 2.5 66610

Pennsylvania

1580 7.7 28.77 59840 2.0 59520

Puerto Rico

70 21.9 19.02 39570 5.4 35550

Rhode Island

120 17.4 29.00 60320 3.3 60600

South Carolina

390 9.4 24.72 51410 4.3 51600

South Dakota

90 20.1 21.02 43720 1.4 43470

Tennessee

400 9.6 27.02 56200 2.3 55060

Texas

3290 6.0 28.24 58750 1.3 57750

Utah

690 10.8 24.76 51500 2.0 49940

Vermont

250 32.6 23.40 48680 4.5 46310

Virginia

2440 7.3 33.22 69090 1.9 66650

Washington

1630 4.8 35.36 73560 5.9 74400

West Virginia

70 20.6 20.51 42650 4.8 40520

Wisconsin

760 6.7 26.12 54330 1.6 52790
Wyoming not included
Total* 46600 27.70** 57630** 56163**

Footnotes:
(1) Estimates for detailed occupations do not sum to the totals because the totals include occupations not shown separately.
Estimates do not include self-employed workers.
(2) Annual wages have been calculated by multiplying the hourly mean wage by 2,080 hours; where an hourly mean wage is not published, the annual wage has been directly calculated from the reported survey data.
(3) The relative standard error (RSE) is a measure of the reliability of a survey statistic. The smaller the relative standard error, the more precise the estimate.
(8) Estimate not released.
*Total line not derived from BLS Create Customized Tables; it's my calculation.
**Alaska not included.

SOC code: Standard Occupational Classification code -- see http://www.bls.gov/soc/home.htm
Data extracted on May 13, 2010

For my perspicacious audience, why is it not appropriate to derive the hourly mean rate, annual mean wage, and annual median wage by adding up the totals for each category and dividing by the number of values in each category (50 in these blue highlighted cases)? That's how I got the total line, but it's wrong...why?

Technical Writing Jobs (Sample*)

Charlotte Area: TechWritingJobs.com
National: WriteJobs.com
National: InDeed.com

*I make no guarantee that the above will be updated.

Top of Page

© UNC Charlotte Copyright | Privacy Statement Page Maintained By: Aaron A. Toscano