Job Outlook for Technical Writers
Below are snippets of information
about the job outlook for technical writers. This information comes directly
from the Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Outlook Handbook (online). The
links for the blocks of text or tables are included above each selection:
http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos089.htm#outlook (emphasis mine)
Job prospects. Job prospects, especially for applicants with solid communication and technical skills, are expected to be good. The growing reliance on technologically sophisticated products in the home and the workplace and the increasing complexity of medical or scientific information needed for daily living will create many new job opportunities for technical writers. However, competition will exist for technical writing positions with more desirable companies and for workers who are new to the occupation. In addition to job openings created by employment growth, some openings will arise as experienced workers retire, transfer to other occupations, or leave the labor force. Also, many freelancers may not earn enough money by freelancing to remain in the occupation, thus generating additional job openings.
Projections data
from the National Employment Matrix
Occupational title |
SOC Code |
Employment, 2008 |
Projected
employment,
2018 |
Change, 2008-2018 |
Number |
Percent |
Technical writers |
27-3042 |
48,900 |
57,800 |
8,900 |
18 |
Data in this table are rounded. See the discussion of the
employment projections table in the Handbook introductory
chapter on
Occupational Information Included in the Handbook. |
|
Projections data
from the National Employment Matrix
Occupational title |
SOC Code |
Employment, 2008 |
Projected
employment,
2018 |
Change, 2008-2018 |
Number |
Percent |
Authors, Writers, and editors |
---
|
281,300
|
303,300
|
22,100
|
8
|
Editors |
27-3041
|
129,600
|
129,200
|
-400
|
0
|
Writers and authors |
27-3043
|
151,700
|
174,100
|
22,500
|
15
|
Data in this table are rounded. See the discussion of the
employment projections table in the Handbook introductory
chapter on
Occupational Information Included in the Handbook. |
|
Occupational Employment
and Wages for Technical Writers(Updated with May 2008 data)
National estimates for this occupation:
Employment estimate and mean wage estimates for this
occupation:
Employment |
Employment
RSE |
Mean
hourly
wage |
Mean
annual
wage |
Wage RSE |
47,460 |
1.9 % |
$30.87 |
$64,210 |
0.7 % |
Percentile wage estimates for this occupation:
Percentile
|
10% |
25% |
50%
(Median) |
75% |
90% |
Hourly Wage
|
$17.55 |
$22.64 |
$29.62 |
$37.94 |
$46.86 |
Annual Wage
|
$36,500 |
$47,100 |
$61,620 |
$78,910 |
$97,460 |
Occupational Employment Statistics
The chart below, which shows technical writers by state,
was derived from the
Create Customized Tables on the BLS's
State profile for this
occupation section of the
Occupational Employment
and Wages, May 2006 page for
Technical Writers. You can use the
Create Customized
Tables feature to see data for all jobs.
Occupation: Technical Writers (SOC code 273042)
Period: May 2006
Area name |
Employment |
Employment percent relative standard error |
Hourly mean wage |
Annual mean wage |
Wage percent relative standard error |
Annual median wage |
Alabama |
540 |
8.0 |
24.95 |
51900 |
1.9 |
50870 |
Alaska |
130 |
20.5 |
27.57 |
57340 |
3.7 |
55610 |
Arizona |
820 |
15.8 |
30.29 |
63010 |
3.3 |
61600 |
Arkansas |
170 |
13.6 |
21.69 |
45120 |
3.9 |
45760 |
California |
6760 |
3.7 |
36.96 |
76880 |
1.9 |
75680 |
Colorado |
1210 |
10.7 |
31.78 |
66100 |
1.1 |
65590 |
Connecticut |
(8)- |
(8)- |
28.13 |
58510 |
2.9 |
56430 |
Delaware |
120 |
21.7 |
26.31 |
54720 |
2.3 |
53920 |
District of Columbia |
570 |
18.6 |
33.76 |
70220 |
1.8 |
68530 |
Florida |
1640 |
8.8 |
27.04 |
56240 |
2.5 |
55640 |
Georgia |
1530 |
10.0 |
31.37 |
65240 |
5.4 |
65680 |
Idaho |
280 |
30.3 |
27.75 |
57710 |
4.7 |
53730 |
Illinois |
1540 |
11.5 |
30.21 |
62840 |
3.2 |
60750 |
Indiana |
730 |
20.3 |
29.35 |
61050 |
9.8 |
52770 |
Iowa |
460 |
7.2 |
29.08 |
60480 |
11.5 |
49410 |
Kansas |
720 |
5.3 |
24.99 |
51980 |
1.8 |
50850 |
Kentucky |
430 |
43.6 |
24.29 |
50520 |
3.1 |
52800 |
Louisiana |
190 |
15.9 |
23.68 |
49250 |
3.0 |
48380 |
Maine |
60 |
17.3 |
22.53 |
46860 |
3.5 |
44900 |
Maryland |
2010 |
6.0 |
31.98 |
66510 |
1.5 |
65250 |
Massachusetts |
2480 |
6.6 |
37.68 |
78380 |
2.1 |
78800 |
Michigan |
2030 |
10.6 |
29.75 |
61890 |
2.1 |
58850 |
Minnesota |
1170 |
7.4 |
30.17 |
62750 |
1.3 |
62810 |
Mississippi |
280 |
35.0 |
22.90 |
47630 |
5.5 |
49870 |
Missouri |
670 |
5.7 |
26.44 |
55000 |
3.8 |
53730 |
Montana |
90 |
20.3 |
22.03 |
45830 |
3.2 |
45750 |
Nebraska |
240 |
11.3 |
22.51 |
46810 |
2.6 |
45500 |
Nevada |
260 |
18.5 |
25.58 |
53200 |
5.6 |
52400 |
New Hampshire |
220 |
10.5 |
34.96 |
72720 |
2.5 |
72290 |
New Jersey |
1750 |
8.1 |
31.61 |
65760 |
2.2 |
62150 |
New Mexico |
390 |
10.3 |
33.92 |
70550 |
8.6 |
64690 |
New York |
1890 |
7.6 |
30.81 |
64070 |
2.1 |
61660 |
North Carolina |
950 |
8.3 |
30.31 |
63040 |
1.5 |
60890 |
North Dakota |
50 |
8.2 |
21.94 |
45640 |
4.2 |
45270 |
Ohio |
1400 |
7.4 |
26.88 |
55910 |
2.8 |
55170 |
Oklahoma |
320 |
14.8 |
21.99 |
45750 |
4.6 |
43390 |
Oregon |
720 |
10.9 |
30.98 |
64450 |
2.5 |
66610 |
Pennsylvania |
1580 |
7.7 |
28.77 |
59840 |
2.0 |
59520 |
Puerto Rico |
70 |
21.9 |
19.02 |
39570 |
5.4 |
35550 |
Rhode Island |
120 |
17.4 |
29.00 |
60320 |
3.3 |
60600 |
South Carolina |
390 |
9.4 |
24.72 |
51410 |
4.3 |
51600 |
South Dakota |
90 |
20.1 |
21.02 |
43720 |
1.4 |
43470 |
Tennessee |
400 |
9.6 |
27.02 |
56200 |
2.3 |
55060 |
Texas |
3290 |
6.0 |
28.24 |
58750 |
1.3 |
57750 |
Utah |
690 |
10.8 |
24.76 |
51500 |
2.0 |
49940 |
Vermont |
250 |
32.6 |
23.40 |
48680 |
4.5 |
46310 |
Virginia |
2440 |
7.3 |
33.22 |
69090 |
1.9 |
66650 |
Washington |
1630 |
4.8 |
35.36 |
73560 |
5.9 |
74400 |
West Virginia |
70 |
20.6 |
20.51 |
42650 |
4.8 |
40520 |
Wisconsin |
760 |
6.7 |
26.12 |
54330 |
1.6 |
52790 |
Wyoming
not included |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total* |
46600 |
|
27.70** |
57630** |
|
56163** |
SOC code: Standard Occupational Classification code -- see
http://www.bls.gov/soc/home.htm
Data extracted on May 13, 2010 |
For my
perspicacious audience, why is it not appropriate to derive the
hourly mean rate, annual mean wage, and annual median wage by adding up the
totals for each category and dividing by the number of values in each category
(50 in these blue highlighted cases)? That's how I got the total line, but it's
wrong...why? |
Technical Writing Jobs (Sample*)
Charlotte Area:
TechWritingJobs.com
National:
WriteJobs.com
National:
InDeed.com *I make no guarantee that the above will be updated. |